Topic: there is no honest person these days
Support: there is no honest person
Against: there is honest person
the speaker for the agaisnt state that there is still honest person and one example is Cik Hjh Naimah (our H.E.P) he state that Cik Hjh Naimah is honest as she tell nothing but the truth to the students especially about the rule which she very determined about it. other than that, he aslo state that MPP also being honest by trying to help student in loosens about the rule but, it only move a little. Furthermore, they also agree that the prophet is honest in all kind. however, this P.O.V has been rejected as prophet is truly honest as they is 'maksum' or people who will never tell lie. second last of their points is they state that teacher is honest is giving out the knowledge, in teaching them and in guide them in choosing the right path in life. last but not least, the true happiness in life is being honest. although the point is a bit walk away from the topic but they main idea what she trying to say is if people are being honest, there will be no worry as happiness will come although sometimes honest could be dangerous.
nevertheless, the supporters also come out with strong arguement as their P.O.V are Cik Naimah is being honest because it her duty to ensure that all student to follow the rule as she as their head which if she does not the leader maybe she would tell a lie. besides that, MPP is actually not being honest as they never try to help, they actually follow the head which has cause them to hate by most of the student as they knew the MPP does not really work that hard in redempt their right especially the rule of outing. in addition, they questioning for those who wanted to be honest but afraid of being cast away and they also state that if they have the heart to say something that is really honest and yet it could break the heart of the person.
in my opinion, to be honest or not is actually up to us as we are the one who created our own path and also our own way of life as if we are being spoiled, it's our fault as we the one who does not resist the temptation of being spoiled by others although we realise that we are too spoiled...
Welcome to Piece of Me... This is who I am, what I am....
20 February 2010
Debate - Aliens does Exist (10/02/10)
Topic: Aliens Does Exist
Support : Aliens Does Exist
Against: Aliens Does Not Exist
Content:
in the first round both parties presented thier P.O.V about this topic and their P.O.V are:-
the first parties, the supporters, they said that they have proof tp prove that aliens does exist, they bring to class the web site that contain the proof that support thier argument that aliens does exist, besides that, they also state that there were history of where pilot actually has seen one which strengthen thier evidence in proving that aliens exist. furthermore, there is relevant smoke or shadow (as they said that) besides there is lots of logical thinking like anything is impossible and last but not least the group said if there is God and why there is isn't aliens?
on the contrary, the against one state as follows, there is still blurry about this alien thing as there is no proof or theories or science in proving that aliens is actually exist. in addition, they said that there is no success experiment and no actual record and activity as it is actually an illogical thingking which it occur by human imagination and it been created by man..
in my opinion, this topic it would be parhaps the hottest topic, if they presented it well as they debate on something that is quite immpossible to be prove right or wrong as before this human itself has debated either this alien is really exist or not..it is because as far as knowlegde it has been known that only Earth has living thing that live in it and other planet, it just a beautiful creature that has been created by it's creator...
last but not least, for me, everything it's not impossible as the birth of the world which there is no exact day when it's been created and how the world function as we never see a hand who run it and rule it...
Support : Aliens Does Exist
Against: Aliens Does Not Exist
Content:
in the first round both parties presented thier P.O.V about this topic and their P.O.V are:-
the first parties, the supporters, they said that they have proof tp prove that aliens does exist, they bring to class the web site that contain the proof that support thier argument that aliens does exist, besides that, they also state that there were history of where pilot actually has seen one which strengthen thier evidence in proving that aliens exist. furthermore, there is relevant smoke or shadow (as they said that) besides there is lots of logical thinking like anything is impossible and last but not least the group said if there is God and why there is isn't aliens?
on the contrary, the against one state as follows, there is still blurry about this alien thing as there is no proof or theories or science in proving that aliens is actually exist. in addition, they said that there is no success experiment and no actual record and activity as it is actually an illogical thingking which it occur by human imagination and it been created by man..
in my opinion, this topic it would be parhaps the hottest topic, if they presented it well as they debate on something that is quite immpossible to be prove right or wrong as before this human itself has debated either this alien is really exist or not..it is because as far as knowlegde it has been known that only Earth has living thing that live in it and other planet, it just a beautiful creature that has been created by it's creator...
last but not least, for me, everything it's not impossible as the birth of the world which there is no exact day when it's been created and how the world function as we never see a hand who run it and rule it...
Debate - We are Happy as We can be (10/02/10)
For our second class of CL, the next lucky group which debate their topic is "we are happy as we can be" and the group is consist of Sitinur Liyana, Ain Nadira, Nik Amirah Hamiza and last but not least Faris. The group or a.k.a panel A, support the statement as they has come with interesting ideas.
The first idea or proposition is the love of family and sibling that make them happy. Where they said that when there is family around you, we will feel happy as we know the peolpe that we care is around us and at the same time, they also said that we can be happy with the close-bond with each other. Second proposition is we can be happy as we are when we lead a good life which consist of the experience of life, by having an ambition and the example that they give is through the series of wonder pet as it happy together by do all the work together as the tagline for wonder pet is 'co-operation'. Last but not least, the third and last proposition is when we can go to shopping and buy food, we also can be happy as we can be, not, forgoten, perfect in everything as they explain that people who are 100% are not disable is really happy and they also claim that if we are healthy we could do lots of work and many other thing
however, panel B (ashila, afiqah, and farihin) state that we cannot be happy as we are and the points are how they can be happy if they come from broken family plus in a family instituition although the siblings are close-bond but, they actually are not that really freindly with each other. and nobody perfect, so, how they want to be happy if they has lost one arm. Besides that, if there is not enough basic need, do they will really happy as they can be. Second last proposition is there is no happiness if there is no education and last but not least, could we just enjoy or happy with our life if the patern of our life is poor and misery.
In my opinion, both panel has try their best to show who point is better, however, there is only one winner and the winner is panel B as they focus more on the world outside not just themselves compare to panel A. I think this is the first debate in class that is actually look like one although the smoothness of the debate not that really smooth, overall, both panels know where they stand.
Last but not least, although that the debate is only in class, however, the situation is bit different as the panels has the aura of being a debaters of state the right with out feel distract or start to pull over from the point that they have stand for earlier...
The first idea or proposition is the love of family and sibling that make them happy. Where they said that when there is family around you, we will feel happy as we know the peolpe that we care is around us and at the same time, they also said that we can be happy with the close-bond with each other. Second proposition is we can be happy as we are when we lead a good life which consist of the experience of life, by having an ambition and the example that they give is through the series of wonder pet as it happy together by do all the work together as the tagline for wonder pet is 'co-operation'. Last but not least, the third and last proposition is when we can go to shopping and buy food, we also can be happy as we can be, not, forgoten, perfect in everything as they explain that people who are 100% are not disable is really happy and they also claim that if we are healthy we could do lots of work and many other thing
however, panel B (ashila, afiqah, and farihin) state that we cannot be happy as we are and the points are how they can be happy if they come from broken family plus in a family instituition although the siblings are close-bond but, they actually are not that really freindly with each other. and nobody perfect, so, how they want to be happy if they has lost one arm. Besides that, if there is not enough basic need, do they will really happy as they can be. Second last proposition is there is no happiness if there is no education and last but not least, could we just enjoy or happy with our life if the patern of our life is poor and misery.
In my opinion, both panel has try their best to show who point is better, however, there is only one winner and the winner is panel B as they focus more on the world outside not just themselves compare to panel A. I think this is the first debate in class that is actually look like one although the smoothness of the debate not that really smooth, overall, both panels know where they stand.
Last but not least, although that the debate is only in class, however, the situation is bit different as the panels has the aura of being a debaters of state the right with out feel distract or start to pull over from the point that they have stand for earlier...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)