Debate - We are Happy as We can be (10/02/10)

For our second class of CL, the next lucky group which debate their topic is "we are happy as we can be" and the group is consist of Sitinur Liyana, Ain Nadira, Nik Amirah Hamiza and last but not least Faris. The group or a.k.a panel A, support the statement as they has come with interesting ideas.

The first idea or proposition is the love of family and sibling that make them happy. Where they said that when there is family around you, we will feel happy as we know the peolpe that we care is around us and at the same time, they also said that we can be happy with the close-bond with each other. Second proposition is we can be happy as we are when we lead a good life which consist of the experience of life, by having an ambition and the example that they give is through the series of wonder pet as it happy together by do all the work together as the tagline for wonder pet is 'co-operation'. Last but not least, the third and last proposition is when we can go to shopping and buy food, we also can be happy as we can be, not, forgoten, perfect in everything as they explain that people who are 100% are not disable is really happy and they also claim that if we are healthy we could do lots of work and many other thing

however, panel B (ashila, afiqah, and farihin) state that we cannot be happy as we are and the points are how they can be happy if they come from broken family plus in a family instituition although the siblings are close-bond but, they actually are not that really freindly with each other. and nobody perfect, so, how they want to be happy if they has lost one arm. Besides that, if there is not enough basic need, do they will really happy as they can be. Second last proposition is there is no happiness if there is no education and last but not least, could we just enjoy or happy with our life if the patern of our life is poor and misery.

In my opinion, both panel has try their best to show who point is better, however, there is only one winner and the winner is panel B as they focus more on the world outside not just themselves compare to panel A. I think this is the first debate in class that is actually look like one although the smoothness of the debate not that really smooth, overall, both panels know where they stand.

Last but not least, although that the debate is only in class, however, the situation is bit different as the panels has the aura of being a debaters of state the right with out feel distract or start to pull over from the point that they have stand for earlier...